Concerns over safety, handling and public perception of future fuels will be increasingly in the spotlight. Huge investments in ports and modernising safety and training regulations are also needed, an industry event has heard
DECARBONISATION will be a huge challenge for ports, according to the director of the UK’s second-biggest container port.
Associated British Ports director Alastair Welch told a Lloyd’s Register panel his port was investing millions of dollars in the UK’s first commercial shore power installation.
He said getting enough power for one cruiseship had meant taking over Southampton’s biggest industrial site, and cobbling together other power sources.
Finding enough to run multiple ships at the same time would require much more government investment, and would cover just a tiny part of a ship’s overall carbon dioxide emissions, Mr Welch said.
Environmental regulations, logistical hurdles safety risks, and public opinion were also important.
“If I think I’m going to have huge stores of hydrogen in the city centre in Southampton, that’s probably unlikely — and equally the same with ammonia,” he said.
He added that in the US shore power was routinely generated from coal power stations, “which is frankly staggering”.
UK Maritime & Coastguard Agency chief executive Brian Johnson said hydrogen, ammonia, and nuclear power — which he considered the only realistic “destination” fuels for shipping — had “massive implications” for ports in the middle of big cities, as well as national security and seafarer training.
Mr Johnson said the fuel transition would require “hopelessly inadequate” port regulation and seafarer training that “looks 40 or 50 years out of date” to be modernised.
